Connect with us

Law

PACAC clarifies on scope of Money Laundering Act 2022, Terrorism Act 2022

Published

on

Share this story

The Money Laundering Act 2022 and the Terrorism Act 2022, are the new advance weapons used to tackle the two major national scourges of Terrorism and money laundering in the country, Chairman Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption, (PACAC) Itse Sagay has declared.
Speaking at a one day event in Abuja on Thursday, Sagay noted that the scope of the Acts exceeds not only what was normally considered as money laundering, but also institutions and provisions, not contained in the 2011 Act.

He said that the emphasis on the inclusion of non-financial institutions within the operations of the Act was an acknowledgment of the significant financial activities of Lawyers, and Accountants particularly, who engage in the movement of money on behalf of their Clients.

“Thus the scope of this Act is very comprehensive and greatly exceeds what we normally consider as money laundering.

“For example, it creates a new body within the EFCC called The Special Control Unit for the effective implementation of money laundering provisions of the Act in relation to the designated non-financial businesses and professions

“The standard meaning of Money Laundering is limited to laundering dirty money, 1.e., investing money obtained by unlawful means into another business which obscures or obliterates the origins of the money invested.
“Blacks Law Dictionary (8 Edition) defines it as “The Act of transferring illegally obtained money through legitimate people or accounts, so that it original source cannot be traced. P. 843.

“It is for this reason I believe, that the draftsman did not include the definition of Money Laundering in the Act. It is a sweeping piece of legislation which covers every type of illegitimate financial transaction not only through the banks, but also through non-financial bodies and even between individuals.
“Technically giving anyone a gift of money above 5 million naira, outside the banking system is an offence. Even if a transfer of funds is within the permitted limits, but is the proceed of a crime to the knowledge of a bank or of a non-financial institution, it must be reported to the EFCC. This clearly demonstrates the illegality of money

“Spraying at parties particularly when the sums sprayed exceeds N5 million or its equivalent in other currencies,” Sagay revealed.

The PACAC Chairman explained that it was clear that the new Act’s sweeping provisions were meant to guarantee that no unlawful transaction could go outside the ambit of the EFCC
as the present situation in which financial crimes Proliferate so much that it is almost choking the country’s economy.

He disclosed that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act 2022 was also going to repeal the Terrorism (Prevention) Act 2011 in order to expand the provisions of the earlier Act and Provide an Effective, Unified and Comprehensive Legal Regulatory and Institutional Frame Work for the Detection, Prevention, Prohibition, Prosecution and Punishment of Acts of terrorism or terrorism financing, Proliferation of Terrorism and Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Nigeria.

He said that the Act was promulgated as part of international cooperation with the United Nations and its member States to suppress and eliminate acts of terrorism everywhere in the World.

According to Sagay, this gives Nigeria the power to proclaim a person or any entity a terrorist or terrorist financier, it also gives Nigerian Court’s extra/territorial jurisdiction in relation to terrorism financing which also contains provisions for freezing, search and seizure, confiscation and forfeiture of terrorist property.

He acknowledged that it was encouraging that Nigeria has now engaged in more vigour in the war against terrorism adding that there must be no quarter to terrorists, who constitute a blight to the individual and collective existence in Nigeria.

Also the Executive Secretary, PACAC, Professor Sadiq Isah Radda called on the media and Civil Societies to perform their duties of informing the public about the fight against corruption and the efforts that have been applied to bring the menace to its bearest minimum by the government and relevant agencies as this could be better done or propagated by the media.

The Executive Secretary said that the Government was making efforts to fight the menace of corruption because this fight was not a choice but a necessity for the development of the country adding that “people who have stolen from the common wealth of the nation should not be allowed to enjoy this proceeds of the crime.”

He also stated that money laundering was a big problem not only on the part of apprehending the perpetrators but also in terms of spreading the awareness and knowledge of the laws that are put in place to fight corruption which noting that there was no going back in fight against corruption, terrorism and money laundering it as long as this present administration was concerned.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Law

EFCC to arraign Bello on Thursday over alleged N80.2b money laundering

Published

on

By

Share this story

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, (EFCC) has indicated it will on Thursday, April 18, 2024 arraign a former governor of Kogi State,  Yahaya Adoza Bello before a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja.

The antigraft agency said Bello will be arraigned before Justice Emeka Nwite alongside three other suspects,  Ali Bello, Dauda Suleiman and Abdulsalam Hudu on 19- count charges bordering on money laundering to the tune of N80, 246,470, 088.88
The arraignment is being perfected following a warrant of arrest and enrolment order granted the EFCC by the court on Wednesday, April 17, 2024. 

Count one of the charges reads: That you, Yahaya Adoza Bello, Ali Bello, Dauda Suliman, and Abdulsalam Hudu( Still at large), sometime, in February, 2016, in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, conspired amongst yourselves to convert the total sum of N80, 246,470, 088.88 which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of the proceeds of your unlawful activity  to wit, criminal breach of trust and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(a) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the Money Laundering ( Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended”.

Count 17 of the charges read: “That you Yahaya Bello between 26th July 2021 to 6th April 2022 in Abuja within the jurisdiction of this Honourable  Court aided E-Traders International Limited to conceal the aggregate sum of  N3081,804,654.00( Three Billion, Eighty One Million Eight Hundred and Four Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Four Naira) in account number 1451458080 domiciled in Access BankPlc, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of unlawful activity to wit, criminal breach of trust and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(a), 15(2) (d) of the Money Laundering ( Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and punishable under Section 15( 3) of the same Act.

Count 18  of the charges reads: “That you Yahaya Adoza Bello  sometime in November 2021 in Abuja within the jurisdiction  of this Honourable Court  indirectly procured E-Traders international Limited to transfer  the aggregate sum of $570,330.00( Five Hundred and Seventy Thousand , Three Hundred and Thirty Dollars) to account number 4266644272 domiciled in TD Bank, United States of America which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of unlawful activity to wit, criminal breach of trust and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 15(2) (d) of the Money Laundering ( Prohibition) Act, 2011 as amended and punishable under Section 15( 3) of the same Act”.

“The Commission’s attempt to execute the Warrant of Arrest lawfully obtained against Bello met stiff resistance  on Wednesday,  April 17,  2024.  The security cordon around the former governor’s residence in Abuja was breached by the current Governor of Kogi State, Usman Ododo who  ensured that the suspect was spirited away in his official vehicle.  
“As a responsible law enforcement agency,  the EFCC exercised restraint in the face of the provocation, waiting for his arraignment on Thursday, April 18,  2024.

“It is needful to state that Bello is not above the law and would be brought to justice as soon as possible.”

Continue Reading

Law

Court bars Ganduje from parading himself as member of APC

Published

on

By

Share this story

Yhe Kano State High Court has granted an ex parte order restraining the National Chairman of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Abdullahi Ganduje, from parading himself as a member of the party.

The court ordered that Ganduje must refrain from presiding over all affairs of the National Working Committee of the APC.

The application waa said to have been granted by Justice Usman Na’abba on Tuesday, following an ex parte motion filed by Dr. Ibrahim Sa’ad on behalf of two executive members of Ganduje’s ward, Dawakin-Tofa Local Government Area, the Assistant Secretary, Laminu Sani and Legal Adviser, Haladu Gwanjo (plaintiffs), who were part of the nine ward executives who suspended Ganduje on Monday.

The court directed the four parties (respondents) joined in the matter, including the APC, NWC, APC Kano State Working Committee, and Ganduje, to henceforth, maintain status quo ante belum as of April 15th,2024 pending the hearing and determination of the substantive suit on April 30th 2024

Justice Na’abba, also held as prayed, stopped State Working Committee APC Kano from interfering with the legally and validly considered decision of executives of Ganduje ward, essentially on action endorsed by a two-thirds majority of the executives as provided by the party constitution.

The ex parte order read,, “An order is hereby granted directing all parties in the suit APC (first), APC National Working Committee (second), Kano State Working Committee APC (third), Dr. Abdullah Umar Ganduje (fourth), to maintain status quo ante belum as of April 15, 2024.
“The order thereby restraining the first respondent (APC) from recognising the fourth respondent (Ganduje) as a member of APC and prohibiting the fourth respondent (Ganduje) from presiding over any affairs of the NWC and restraining the state Working Committee from interfering with the legally and validly decision of the ward executives of Ganduje ward.

“That the fourth respondent (Ganduje}is prohibited from parading himself as a . member of APC or doing any act that may _ portray him or seem to be a member of APC pending the hearing and determination of the
substantive suit.”

Nine members of the Ganduje ward proclaimed the suspension of the National Chairman of the APC over the allegation of corruption slammed on him by the Kano State Government.

The nine APC executives said they were prompted to act following a petition written by one Ja’afaru Adamu, a member of the AP from the National chairman’s polling unit.

in the petition, Adamu complained over allegations of corruption charges against the
former governor just as he urged the ward leaders to investigate the matter to redeem the dented image of the party and the implication on President Bola Tinubu’s fight against corruption.

Although the chairman and secretary of the ward failed to act on the petition filed en April 8, 2024, nine members of the executives, led by the legal adviser, acted upon the petition, a decision that led to Ganduje’s suspension.

Continue Reading

Law

Mambilla Update: Agunloye heads to Appel Court over ruling fundamental rights

Published

on

By

Share this story

Justice Obiora Egwuatu at the Federal High Court in Abuja has dismissed a Suit filed by Agunloye in June 2023 to restrain EFCC from harassing him and breaching his fundamental rights because of the ongoing International Arbitration on Mambilla Power Project

The points made by Agunloye in the Civil Suit which had dragged for over nine months had become irrelevant or expired in reality because the EFCC, the Respondent, had, while the case was in progress, declared Agunloye wanted, detained him, maltreated him in detention.
The antigraft agency also arraigned him before another court and remanded him in prison until the court granted him bail.

The court under Justice Egwuatu, however, did not consider the merits of the case largely on the ground that EFCC has the power to carry out its statutory duties and can not be stopped by the Court. On this basis, Justice Egwuatu dismissed the suit and awarded costs.

Agunloye’s lawyers have expressed preparedness in respect of the appeal considering that the court admitted basing its ruling on the suit being “an attempt to use the instrumentality of the Court to shield the Applicant from criminal investigation and to interfere with the statutory authority of the Respondent to investigate crimes or allegations of same in line with the EFCC Act.”

It is believed that the duties of EFCC must be performed in accordance with the law, and the court has the powers to stop any infraction by the EFCC in the course of performance of its duties. Such does not amount to interference with the statutory duties of EFCC but a legal checkmate of its powers to deter likely abuse.

With the Agunloye heading to
appeal against the Judgement, the case is far from being over, and the Court of Appeal will take the opportunity to look at the case extensively.

Continue Reading

Trending